The "English Only" Movement Needs To Take A Good Look At The Law Books

Because it's been completely infiltrated with foreigners. The English Only movement wants to make English the official language of the United States. It seems they have focused their concern mainly on the diffusion of Spanish into US culture, with labels and signs being printed in both languages.

Yet I'm not aware of any outrage against the corruption of our legal language by the Romans. Just look at some of the ridiculous phrases I've found in Virginia law:

• Mutatis mutandis (139 references)
• Guardian ad litem (158 references)
• Sui juris (5 references)
• subpoena duces tecum (83 references)
• subpoena ad testificandum (1 reference)
  

That says nothing to the words and phrases that have already wormed their way into our beautiful language. Words and phrases such as:

• Habeas corpus
• Fiduciary
  
• Affidavit
  

But in all seriousness, why are we still using Latin in our law books? Is it because it's more obscure and therefore more intimidating? Is it because there's a long tradition of using Latin in law (there was a long tradition of not letting women vote also, it doesn't mean it was right).

There are perfectly good English words and phrases that could be used to make the law more understandable to common people. How many non-attorneys have a clue what "subpoena duces tecum" means? I'd bet the number is ZERO unless someone has been subjected to one.

And isn't one of the cornerstones of Western jurisprudence (OMG, there it is AGAIN) that the common people have the ability to read and understand the law?