Nationals Not Paying Off for D.C.
Duh. Who would have thought building a $700 million stadium was a good idea?
And DC Schools are just as bad as they used to be.
Showing posts with label Morons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Morons. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Nancy Grace has Leonard Padilla On Right Now
He seems about as smart as she is. At least Leonard now realizes Casey Anthony is guilty. Something everyone else figured out about 2 months ago.
2 mins of Nancy Grace is better than Ipecac
2 mins of Nancy Grace is better than Ipecac
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
"Red State vs. Blue State" Is Designed To Control Your Political Choice
If you haven't figured it out yet, the whole Red vs. Blue concept is a media ploy designed to make you feel that there are only two political choices out there: RED or BLUE.
The truth is, that Red Vs. Blue is the media's own concoction (specifically Tim Russert's) designed to limit the choices they need to cover. They don't have to worry about covering too many political conventions for example, because after all, there's only the Red one and the Blue one.
Resist the media's attempt to dumb down the American political process.
The truth is, that Red Vs. Blue is the media's own concoction (specifically Tim Russert's) designed to limit the choices they need to cover. They don't have to worry about covering too many political conventions for example, because after all, there's only the Red one and the Blue one.
Resist the media's attempt to dumb down the American political process.
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
The Problem With Cell Phone Cameras
Cameras are everywhere these days. check out Flickr and you'll soon see that camera phones are one of the most popular cameras out there. The iPhone was responsible for over 17,000 of the pictures uploaded just yesterday. In fact, the top 5 camera phones were used to upload nearly 40,000 picutres yesterday. Video is everywhere as well, as most camera phones have video capability. The police have started to realize that a lot of the time they are on the street, they're being watched and possibly recorded.
So this brings us to the point of this post. Where are all the pictures of the ghosts and monsters? A recent scan of the recent 'ghost' pictures has led me to a sad reality. About 80% of paranormal 'ghost' pictures these days are of the orb variety. Orbs, if you're not aware, are basically photos of dust particles in the air passed off as weird paranormal sightings. I'm not sure when these lame photos began to be passed off as ghosts, but it was a sad day for the hard working paranormal investigator. Another 19% of the pictures are equally lame lens flair pictures which are passed off as 'ectoplasm'. I hope the last 1% is something more interesting, but I really haven't seen it yet. Take a look and let me know if you find anything interesting.
And where are the pictures of the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot and UFOs???
So this brings us to the point of this post. Where are all the pictures of the ghosts and monsters? A recent scan of the recent 'ghost' pictures has led me to a sad reality. About 80% of paranormal 'ghost' pictures these days are of the orb variety. Orbs, if you're not aware, are basically photos of dust particles in the air passed off as weird paranormal sightings. I'm not sure when these lame photos began to be passed off as ghosts, but it was a sad day for the hard working paranormal investigator. Another 19% of the pictures are equally lame lens flair pictures which are passed off as 'ectoplasm'. I hope the last 1% is something more interesting, but I really haven't seen it yet. Take a look and let me know if you find anything interesting.
And where are the pictures of the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot and UFOs???
Monday, June 09, 2008
GM lost $39 Billion in 2007
It's a good thing they canceled that electric car program back in 2003. Who on Earth would ever want to buy an electric car?
Sunday, June 01, 2008
The Baltimore Sun Lives Up To Their Abbreviation
The "BS" shows you can never stoop too low in an effort to sell newspapers.
An eye-catching headline like this is bound to sell some papers:
What difference does it make if that's a completely unsubstantiated claim?
The article, claims that 44% of the guns used in Maryland crimes were from other states, and then continues on to quote various Maryland officials who pat themselves on the back and take credit for the high percentage. Why? Because it clearly shows that Maryland's gun laws are so tough, criminals are going outside the state to buy their guns. Of course they don't take credit for the fact that the majority of guns are still purchased in Maryland. Only politicians have spines so flexible.
But what about that percentage? Turns out, if you actually look at the study(PDF) their story was based on, the facts are oh so different.
The study is based on gun serial number traces. It shows that in Maryland there were 7,517 gun traces (usually by law enforcement) in 2007. Of those, in only 4,397 traces were the ATF able to tell where the gun was originally purchased. Of those, 44% came from a state other than Maryland.
The front page of the study clearly states the following two very important facts the Baltimore Sun doesn't want you to know:
An eye-catching headline like this is bound to sell some papers:
Illicit guns flow into Maryland: In '07 crimes, 44% of firearms were imported
What difference does it make if that's a completely unsubstantiated claim?
The article, claims that 44% of the guns used in Maryland crimes were from other states, and then continues on to quote various Maryland officials who pat themselves on the back and take credit for the high percentage. Why? Because it clearly shows that Maryland's gun laws are so tough, criminals are going outside the state to buy their guns. Of course they don't take credit for the fact that the majority of guns are still purchased in Maryland. Only politicians have spines so flexible.
But what about that percentage? Turns out, if you actually look at the study(PDF) their story was based on, the facts are oh so different.
The study is based on gun serial number traces. It shows that in Maryland there were 7,517 gun traces (usually by law enforcement) in 2007. Of those, in only 4,397 traces were the ATF able to tell where the gun was originally purchased. Of those, 44% came from a state other than Maryland.
The front page of the study clearly states the following two very important facts the Baltimore Sun doesn't want you to know:
- Law enforcement agencies may request firearms traces for any reason, and those reasons are not necessarily reported to the Federal Government. Not all firearms used in crime are traced and not all firearms traced are used in crime.
- The firearms selected do not constitute a random sample and should not be considered representative of the larger universe of all firearms used by criminals or any subset of that universe.
So how does the BS determine that 44% of guns used in Maryland crimes came from other states when we don't know if any of those guns were used in crimes? And even if they were, the study's own authors (ATF) state that they are in no way, shape or form representative of all firearms used in crimes in Maryland.
So what does that mean about the BS' statement of "In '07 crimes, 44% of firearms were imported"?
The Baltimore Sun completely made that up. Why? The only answer I can come up with is that it supports an agenda either the Baltimore Sun and/or reported Annie Linskey has. There can be no other explanation.
Remember that the next time some 'news' source quotes some statistic. In this case, the BS story was absent any details (or even a link to the source). That should always tell you there's something really wrong with what they're telling you and their only option is to hide the truth from you.
So what does that mean about the BS' statement of "In '07 crimes, 44% of firearms were imported"?
The Baltimore Sun completely made that up. Why? The only answer I can come up with is that it supports an agenda either the Baltimore Sun and/or reported Annie Linskey has. There can be no other explanation.
Remember that the next time some 'news' source quotes some statistic. In this case, the BS story was absent any details (or even a link to the source). That should always tell you there's something really wrong with what they're telling you and their only option is to hide the truth from you.
Labels:
ATF,
Baltimore Sun,
firearms,
guns,
Hidden Agendas,
Lies,
Mainstream media,
Morons
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Who Thought Schapelle Corby's Excuse Was BS?
If you think Schapelle Corby's excuse of "Those are not my drugs!" was unbelievable, perhaps you should take a look at this story. A Japanese police officer stuck 1/3 of a lb of pot into some unsuspecting passenger's suitcase at Tokyo Airport in order to test out his drug dog. The dog failed to find the pot, and the cop couldn't remember which bag he put it in.
Oops. Now someone is traveling around with 142 grams of pot in their suitcase. I hope they're not on their way to Indonesia.
Oops. Now someone is traveling around with 142 grams of pot in their suitcase. I hope they're not on their way to Indonesia.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Paul Begala Says Fox News Lied To The Public, Even After Knowing It was A Lie
Fox takes the lead in sucking after getting caught red handed (knowingly) pushing false information.
I think I've figured out what they mean by "We report, you decide." You get to decide if they're feeding you B.S. or not.
I think I've figured out what they mean by "We report, you decide." You get to decide if they're feeding you B.S. or not.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Does Fox News Suck More Than CNN?
Well, I didn't think it was possible, but I think Fox is taking the lead in sucking. Take a look at this clip, where moron ex-Miss America Gretchen Carlson asks Ron Paul to play a word game.
Here's what she asks him @ 1:36 seconds
From what I can tell, that's correct.
To see how utterly ridiculous Fox News has become, take a look at this: Fox News Porn. You'd think it would be 'not suitable for work', but it's nothing but actual Fox News clips. Hilarious, but with a serious message - Fox News Sucks.
Here's what she asks him @ 1:36 seconds
"OK...let me ah...do ah..a little kind of a situation with you here. I'm going to say a topic and if you can give me a one word response (sic). IRAQ-Mainstream Media- Immigration-War On Terror" (Watch Carlson's eye's light up after she finishes saying "IRAQ" at 1:43 seconds. It's like she just tied her shoes for the first time. I think she was just proud she could read all those big words, even though she's unable to speak in complete sentences.)So why does Gretchen want to play the "Let's put a complex issue into one word" game? Perhaps it's because she can only ponder one word at a time. But I suspect it's more because she's been told that one word is the maximum that a Fox News audience member can grasp.
From what I can tell, that's correct.
To see how utterly ridiculous Fox News has become, take a look at this: Fox News Porn. You'd think it would be 'not suitable for work', but it's nothing but actual Fox News clips. Hilarious, but with a serious message - Fox News Sucks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

