The US goes after the (Wiki) Leaker. But what about the Flooders?

So the US is all upset about Julian Assange and Wikileaks. They have expressed their glee that he's been arrested in the UK for charges in Sweden. Eric Holder has launched a Justice Department probe. Some have even suggested that he be charged in the US with spying.

But here's an interesting experiment. Ask people you know what they know about the leaks. They'll probably tell you they heard (at least) the following:

• The USA pressured countries to take Guantanamo prisoners
• Saudi Arabia is the primary funding source for Al Qaeda
• Egypt would be 'ok' with the US bombing Iran
• Hillary Clinton ordered her staff to spy on representatives at the UN

Once they've told you about the leaks, ask them where they learned of them. Ask them "So you read this on the Wikileaks site?" I bet that 100% of them say no. They heard it from The New York Times (and the multitude of other papers who republished them after that).

Julian Assange didn't steal the secret cables. Bradley Manning did and will likely spend the rest of his life in a military prison. Assange just published them. Just like the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and The LA Times, etc. And since most people learned of the cable's contents from those news sites/papers, aren't they the more damaging source? Aren't those 'sites' the ones who are really revealing these 'secret' cables to the world?

So why hasn't the US government pounded its fists on the table demanding the editors of the NY Times be arrested?

It's all a little strange.

The Peon Pulpit's Best Shows On Television (2010)

1. Best News Show - RedEye W/Greg Gutfeld (FOX)
2. Best Reality Series - The Haunted (Discovery/Animal Planet) Stretching the 'reality' series designation, but all the other reality series are clearly fake as well. This one is at least interesting.
3. Best Drama Series - Dexter (Showtime)
4. Best Documentary Series - Frontline (PBS)
   
5. Best Comedy Show - Tosh.0 (Comedy Central)
   
6. Best Political Show - The McLachlan group (TMG)
7. Best Guilty Pleasure TV - America's Funniest Home Videos [ABC/Syndication] - I love this show...guaranteed laughs for me.
8. Best Educational/Documentary Series - Top Gear [BBC] - Even if I'm not a real petrolhead, I appreciate Jeremy Clarkson's sense of humor (it's also clear that Clarkson is the real-life blueprint for Alan Partridge)
   

The Rise of Government 'Privileges"

USA Today ran a story about how some public school districts are trying to enforce year round conduct standards on their students. The current target of these conduct contracts are students involved in extracurricular activities. You can be sure that the rest will soon follow. What bothers me about public schools enforcing conduct standards (some of the prohibited conduct is not illegal, BTW) is that you have to sign one in order to participate in extracurricular activities. School administrators justify this intrusion into students private lives by the "it's a privilege, not a right" mantra. Every adult who drives has no doubt heard that driving is a privilege and not a right. The first time you hear that, it's slightly shocking, since not being able to drive in America is basically a condemnation to poverty (unless you live in Manhattan or have a chauffeur).

However, the privilege argument begins to fall apart when over zealous school administrators try to apply it to public schools which are funded by public taxes. Driving can be seen as a right because as a citizen, I don't have to do it. I could opt to not buy a car, not get a driver's license, not pay insurance, etc. However, as a minor in America, I can't opt out of school attendance. As a property owner in the US, I cannot opt not to pay my property taxes which fund the schools and their extracurricular activities. So what kind of privilege are we talking about where I have to pay for it but the government can require me to give up my constitutional rights in order to take advantage of it? Using this logic, the fire department could tell me that their pumping water on my burning home is a privilege and not a right, and If I really want that privilege, I better sign their contract saying I'll be good 24 hours a day (and they define what 'good' is) and perhaps wax their cars while I'm at it.

It won't be long before an unelected government administrator tries to convince us that corruption free government is a privilege, not a right.

What will you be willing to give up to get it?

Recession was over more than a year ago? Ignorance really is strength.

The National Bureau of Economic Research says the worst recession since WW II ended June 2009.

If that's true, then the current recession started in July 2009.

Seriously, is anyone buying this?

Remember - The Peon Pulpit Called It First

Remember back in 2008 when I made my first stock market prediction and was somewhat amazed that it failed to even come close to being accurate? At the time I suggested that perhaps the Fed was covertly purchasing stocks to prop up the market artificially:

It does seem like every time the market makes some huge drop (like 11/13/2008's -554.11 drop) it makes a remarkable close up the next day (11/14/2008's 324.88

Could it be bargain hunters? Or could it be the Treasury/FED monster propping up the dead?

Either way, you heard it here first.

Well it appears that now I'm not alone in my suspicions:

Newsday Learns An Important Lesson

As pointed out here on the Pulpit, charging people for news is one sure way to get people to stop reading your news. Three months into their own 'pay to read' experiment, Newsday.com has a total of (35) paid subscribers. Yes...THIRTY-FIVE. They paid $4 million to upgrade the site to accept payments, and have made $9,000. Heh. Good riddance. That's the price you pay for not reading the Pulpit Newsday.

Next up: The New York Times.... I'm looking forward to that crash and burn.

Brown Win In Massachusetts Throws A Lifeline To Democrats

I suspect that the Scott Brown win in the race for Massachusetts senator will throw Democrats a lifeline. Unlike statements made earlier in the week that the Senate may delay seating Brown until they can pass a health care reform bill, I think Democrats will move to swiftly seat Brown.

The reason is simple: Democrats running for re-election in 2010 want out of the bill as fast as possible. They might push a watered down bill, which, like Keith Olbermann suggested, will only "mandate child-proof medicine bottles". I doubt they will even do that, as it will continue to keep the health care issue (which is now a Democratic albatross) in people's minds.

I also predict that the "tea bagger" jokes that have been repeated countless times by Democrats on television will suddenly fall out of favor. I bet making fun of the tea party movement Isn't going to be as popular with elected Democrats as it once was. This will leave it up to democratic mouthpieces (like Olbermann) to keep it alive. Eventually, even he'll be asked to tone it down, for fear that it will only serve to stoke voter anger against Democrats.