New York Times Get's Caught Lying...Again

The New York Times used be "all the news that's fit to print". Now it's mainly known for a continual stream of serious screw ups, ranging from bad fact checking to the publishing of outright lies.

Today comes word of the latest New York Times slander by way of yet ANOTHER fact-free article. In a blog piece published on the Times' website by the Virginia Heffernan,the NY Times published 'allegations' that Ron Paul is a Neo-Nazi. Where did these allegations come from? Apparently their only source was Bill White, the "Commander of the American National Socialist Workers' Party." The times is apparently so friendly with the American National Socialist Worker's Party, that there was no need to fact check this radical and sweeping allegation. No, instead they allowed it to be printed on their website verbatim.

The NY Times, after feeling the wrath of upset Paul supporters and realizing that the blog post bordered on slander/libel, published this "editor's note" (my emphasis added):

Editors' Note: The post below, which appeared on The Medium on Monday, contained several errors. Stormfront, which describes itself as a "white nationalist" Internet community, did not give money to Ron Paul's presidential campaign; according to Jesse Benton, a spokesman for Paul's campaign, it was Don Black, the founder of Stormfront, who donated $500 to Paul. The post also repeated a string of assertions by Bill White, the commander of the American National Socialist Workers Party, including the allegation that Paul meets regularly "with members of the Stormfront set, American Renaissance, the Institute for Historic Review and others" at a restaurant in Arlington, Va. Paul never attended these dinners, according to Benton, who also says that Paul has never knowingly met Bill White. Norman Singleton, a congressional aide in Paul's office, says that he met Bill White at a dinner gathering of conservatives several years ago, after which Singleton expressed his indignation at the views espoused by White to the organizer of the dinner. The post should not have been published with these unverified assertions and without any response from Paul.

After 290 comments on the story, and this embarrassing story making the rounds on the Internet, the Times has closed the blog to comments. I'm sure it will be accidentally 'removed' from the website soon enough. So what will happen to Virginia Heffernan? My guess is absolutely nothing. I suspect the higher ups at the NY Times support her in her campaign to smear Ron Paul. She will just join the NYTIMES hall-of-fame-er Jayson Blair as the typical NY Times "reporter".

I guess that means Ron Paul is officially in the ridicule (read: smear) stage that Mahatma Gandhi so succinctly outlined: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win ."